Gender bias sa Wikipedia

An Gender bias sa Wikipedia, inaapod man bilang an Wikipedia gender gap, nagpapahiling sana na mayorya kan mga volunteer sa Wikipedia, partikularmente sa English-language site, mga lalake. Asin kadidiit sana sagkod mas hababa an kalidad kan mga artikulo na manungod sa mga babayi o mga urulay manungod sa mga babayi. Iyo ini an pira sa mga tuyaw sa Wikipedia. Ini pinagkokonsiderar bilang systemic bias sa Wikipedia. An Wikipedia Foundation, na iyo an nagpapadalagan kan Wikipedia, nag-uuyon man sa tuyaw na ini asin padagos man sinda padagos man sinda sa pagkonduktar nin mga aktibidad tangani na magdugang pa an pag-edit kan mga babayi sa Wikipedia. An mga Edit-a-thons nagtatabang tangani na mag ekominar sa mga babaying editor asin magdugang an mga artikulong manungod sa mga babayi.

The Wikipedia Monument in Słubice, Poland nagpapahiling nin parehong lalaki asin babaying mga paraambag. An inot na modelopara sa rebulto anas mga lalaki.

The Gender Gap on Wikipedia Presentation

Mga saliksik asin isyu

An mga survey nagpapahiling na nasa tahaw nin 8.5% asin 16% kan mga editor sa Wikipedia mga babayi. Pinagtutuyaw man kan mga akademiko asin journalist an Wikipedia huli sa pagkakaigwa nin labing lalaking mga contributor asin sa dai pagkakaigwa nin mga maray na artikulo manungod sa babayi. Kairiba pa igdi an tuywa na kadiit sana man an mga editor na babayi. An sabi pa kan New York Times na an pagpartisipar kan mga babayi sa Wikipedia baad kalinya kan "public thought-leadership forums". KAn taon 2009, sarong survey kan Wikimedia Foundation an nagpapahiling na 6% kan mga editors na naghaman nin nasa 500 edits mga babayi, mantang an mga lalakeng editor nagdodoble igdi an edits.

Mga posibleng kawsa

Pirang mga kawsa an pinagsuhestyon katakod kaini. Igwa nin pag-adal kan 2010 na nagpapahiling na an Wikipedia female participation rate na 13 porsyento, harani sa 15 porsyento na participasyon kan "public thought-leadership forums". An Wikipedia research fellow na si Sarah Stierch pinag-aku na "fairly common" sa mga Wikipedia contributors na magin gender-anonymous. Pighihiling man bilang kultura asin pagtolerar sa biyolensya asin abusadong lenggwahe an nagin rason para magkaigwa nin siring na gender gap.

Mga kua kan Media

• Bort, Julie (15 February 2014). "A Growing Army Of Women Are Taking On Wikipedia's Sexism Problem". Business Insider. http://www.businessinsider.com/growing-army-of-women-take-on-wikipedia-2014-2. Retrieved on 9 August 2014. 
• Filipacchi, Amanda (24 April 2013). "Wikipedia's Sexism Toward Women Novelists". New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/opinion/sunday/wikipedias-sexism-toward-female-novelists.html. 
• Filipacchi, Amanda (30 April 2013). "Sexism on Wikipedia Is Not the Work of 'a Single Misguided Editor'". The Atlantic (Atlantic Monthly Group). https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/sexism-on-wikipedia-is-not-the-work-of-a-single-misguided-editor/275405/. Retrieved on 9 August 2014. 
• Gleick, James (29 April 2013). "Wikipedia's Women Problem". New York Review of Books (NYREV). http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2013/apr/29/wikipedia-women-problem/. Retrieved on 19 November 2013. 
• Kloppenburg, Julia; Buchem, Ilona; Ducki, Antje; Khayati, Sarah; Weichert, Nils (2014). Charting Diversity: Working Together Towards Diversity in Wikipedia. Berlin: Wikimedia Deutschland. ISBN 978-3-9816799-0-8. Retrieved 9 August 2014. 
• Knibbs, Kate (10 February 2014). "Chipping away at Wikipedia's gender bias, one article at a time". The Daily Dot. http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/wikipedia-gender-bias-feminist-editors/. Retrieved on 30 April 2014. 
• Leonard, Andrew (29 April 2013). "Wikipedia's shame: Sexism isn't the problem at the online encyclopedia. The real corruption is the lust for revenge.". Salon Media Group. http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/wikipedias_shame/. Retrieved on 9 August 2014. 
• Morris, Kevin (1 May 2013). "Does Wikipedia's sexism problem really prove that the system works?". The Daily Dot. http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-sexism-problem-sue-gardner/. Retrieved on 19 November 2013. 
• Zandt, Deanna (26 April 2013). "Yes, Wikipedia is Sexist". Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/deannazandt/2013/04/26/yes-wikipedia-is-sexist-thats-why-it-needs-you/. Retrieved on 19 November 2013. 
• Zevallos, Zuleyka (8 June 2014). "Sexism on Wikipedia: Why the #YesAllWomen Edits Matter". othersociologist.com. Zuleyka Zevallos. Retrieved 9 August 2014. 
• "Where Are the Women in Wikipedia?". New York Times. 2 February 2011. https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/02/02/where-are-the-women-in-wikipedia. Retrieved on 9 August 2014.  - Introduction and links to eight opinions.
• Paling, Emma (21 October 2015). "How Wikipedia Is Hostile to Women". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 21 October 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20151021174625/http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/how-wikipedia-is-hostile-to-women/411619/. Retrieved on 21 October 2015.